Monday, November 29, 2010

In Conclusion:The James Bond Series Redux



In 2008 I saw the recent version of Casino Royale for the first time. The result was an interest in the James Bond series for me.In April 2009 I began going over the James Bond series. I began with Dr. No and concluded with A View to a Kill. Included in this was the non-Eon production Never Say Never Again.

I wrapped the series up the same month with the option of watching the rest later. Over the next few months I went over the next four films in the series The Living Daylights, Licence to Kill, Goldeneye, and Tomorrow Never Dies. The previous 2 weeks I have decided to finish the series by watching the uncut versions of the previously mentioned films while going back over On Her Majesty's Secret Service, The Spy Who Loved Me, and A View to a Kill and seeing The World is Not Enough, Die Another Day, Quantum of Solace, the 1954 made for tv film Casino Royale, and the 1967 parody of the priorly mentioned film. A few months went by and I decided to give the first 15 Bond films a do-over since I hadn't seen most of them in a while and I felt the Moore films weren't given a fair chance.

So here's a revised ranking of my favorite Bond films, girls, Bonds, villians, and theme songs.

Films(non EON included):
1.Licence to Kill-This is what Ian Fleming had in mind when it came to James Bond. I know fans of the series typically dislike it but Bond here is at its toughest. I'm happy to see a vengeance plot for a Bond film because it was overdue by then. Robert Davi as Franz Sanchez makes for a BAMF villain.

2.You Only Live Twice-Some criticize this as the downhill slope of the Bond series. In my view I consider this to be the pinnacle of the Connery/Lazenby/Moore era. Sean Connery does a fantastic job and the payoff is reveal of Blofeld. 1960's Japan makes it even more fun.

3.The Living Daylights-This was a turn in the right direction for the series. A View to a Kill was the pit of the series and this film brought it back from the grave it was about to hit. The plotline makes this film. What hurt is though is the lack of a strong central villain. We're presented with 3 antagonists:Brad Whitaker, Necros, and Koskov. Koskov is a pretty fun guy and a typical asshole but doesn't make for the strong antagonist. Necros is a good henchman but doesn't really do much. What throws me off is that Whitaker is supposed to be the main antagonist. Joe Don Baker for once does a great job in a film. In my opinion they should've done more with Whitaker; but the plotline, Timothy Dalton, and the very beautiful Kara Milovy save it.

4.From Russia with Love-I didn't like it the first time around. However upon second viewing I consider it to be a great edition in the series. It was a vast improvement over Dr. No. Tatiana Romanova is the best Bond girl of the Connery films hands down. Red Grant makes for a very perfect and capable antagonist to Bond and Rosa Klebb is what every Bond female villain should be modeled after.

5.On Her Majesty's Secret Service-This is another film I didn't like the first time around. However after viewing it again I've come to love it. While I dislike Blofeld's scheme I do like the story with Bond and Tracy. What hurts this film though is that the lighting is extremely poor at times and George Lazenby aside from one scene is just bad. Otherwise I enjoy the music, I enjoy the acting(not Lazneby's however), I enjoy the plotline(the Bond/Tracy one not Blofeld's scheme), and I enjoy this film. Although I don't like Lazenby his final scene makes the movie ironically enough.

6.Goldfinger-It was nice to see Bond come to America, I wish he'd done more there in the 60's. What makes this a good Bond film is that you have a good plotline, a great villain and the film wastes no time getting to the action. My issue is they throw it at an odd spot. In the first two films they were building up SPECTRE but they seem to drop it here. Another factor that hurts it is that it feels very rushed at times and is inferior to the original Fleming story. I recently heard a radio adaptation of Fleming's tale and if its as accurate as they said it is then I feel they missed the boat slightly here. Then again, MPAA censors in the 1960's would've never went for the content of the original novel. Shirley Bassey's song in the beginning helps a lot as well.

7.Goldeneye-For the first time since the Connery days they actually made 3 straight good Bond films. Goldeneye is a classic no matter what anyone says. Pierce Brosnan's Bond isn't as good as Timothy Dalton's but he still does a good job in this film. Sean Bean as 006 is a fantastic antagonist and the Bond humor is very well done here.

8.The World is Not Enough-I'll get some heat for this but I really liked this film. I consider it to be the bizzaro version of On Her Majesty's Secret Service in the sense that Elektra appears to be Tracy, a scared girl who is sad and needs Bond. The twist in the middle makes it more enjoyable. My only issues with this film is that I dislike Renard and that Denise Richards sucks at acting. Otherwise I like the plot, I like Pierce's performance, I like Elektra, and Judi Dench is at her best here.

9.Casino Royale(2006)-As much as I wish it had been done in the 60's, this film was worth the wait. As much as I don't like the new grittier Bond, I feel this is still a good movie. Daniel Craig plays a very good Bond here(the same can't be said for Quantum) and I feel the performances by each of the actors were very well done. Nice to see a faithful Fleming adaptation for a change. Its a very good start to the new series even if I don't like the direction of it.

10.The Man with the Golden Gun-The idea of assassin vs assassin makes this film fun. Scaramanga is a great villain and the perfect rival for Bond. China made for a good setting in this film but its not as fun as a setting as Japan was. My problem with this film is that they don't take it serious and is riddled with the camp that would haunt the series. I have no problem with Scaramanga having a sidekick but Nick Nack was just not a proper choice. I also feel that J.W. Pepper was completely unnecessary. Christopher Lee has one of his best performances here and for once I enjoyed Roger Moore's Bond. I do think however if this was a Connery or Dalton film it would've been better.

11.Diamonds Are Forever-Connery's final outing(well at least to the people at EON). What I liked about this film was the plotline for starters particularly the swerve in the middle. Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd make very good henchmen and I feel they should've been used more in this film. Charles Gray's Blofeld was really odd but I didn't mind it too much. However I take issue with the "Blofeld in drag" scene. They somehow took a threatening and dangerous villain and made him a comedic villain. This film is where we start seeing the campy Bond that plauged cinemas til A View to a Kill. I felt if they took this more serious it would've been in my Top 5. However I will say I liked the humor. Something I can't say about any of the Moore entries.

12.For Your Eyes Only-Ok, I'll admit I was very unfair to this film when I reviewed it 9 months ago. Well just like a new born baby things have changed. I really really liked this movie. Kristatos is not that bad and while I still hate Bibi that doesn't kill it dead. Roger Moore gives his best Bond here and is a total badass. I wouldn't want to mess with Bond in this one. Melina is beautiful and Sheena Easton's voice can hypnotize like a Siren.

13.The Spy Who Loved Me-I don't like saying it but...I enjoyed Roger Moore in this film. Typically I dislike the Moore films but in this case I liked it. Stromberg isn't a bad villain but I particularly don't care for him. Its nice seeing Bond actually working with the Navy for once and XXX is simply beautiful. Jaws is a great henchmen but its absurd that he survives ANYTHING. The action sequences are fun and I wish that they reverted back to being serious after this. Sadly it just got more silly. I do wonder though how different it would've been if they had gone with Blofeld as the villain once more.

14.Thunderball-I will say I liked it better but its still the same to me. It drags at times but the action can be good. Connery does a great job here overall but pacing was a massive issue.

15.Live and Let Die-The opening sequence is rather odd with African-Americans killing random white guy. The title song is good(it is all Paul McCartney so naturally its great by default). But the film suffers for the fact that it just drags at times and Mr. Big makes for a bad Bond villain simply because its obvious who he is. From a 1970's perspective it seems good but in the year 2010 I find it dreadful.

16.Dr. No-Its a start lets put it that way. To this day I'm not sure why they chose Dr. No to start the series. Its not a bad choice and it does establish the standard of Bond films. I didn't like this the 2nd time though as much as I did the first. Dr. No is not a bad villain but he's not as good as the ones who came after. I consider this the equivalent to a TV pilot.

17.Casino Royale(1954)-Yes the only James Bond film in the 50's. Its rather odd looking back as it doesn't resemble the EON series at all. There are times I get the Bond feel to it but I don't like some of the ideas they had. Bond should be British no matter what anyone says. I liked Barry Nelson's performance but I can't ever imagine him playing Bond in the EON series. He tried that's all I can say. Peter Lorre made for a great villain. I liked him as Le Chiffre and while he doesn't fit the mold of an EON Bond villain he still makes for a very capable and strong antagonist. I wonder what a 1950's Bond series would be like.

18.Quantum of Solace-I liked that it wrapped up the story to Casino Royale but I feel that its too short, too dull, and weak in comparison. Dominic Greene is not a threatening villain nor is he a smart villain. My issue with modern antagonists is that they're too weak and too much of a coward. I'm interested in the Quantum storyline but if I see anymore like this, I will cringe. Its just a very bad movie, the title song isn't good, the plotline is okish, and Dominic Greene sucks.

19.Tomorrow Never Dies-The title makes no sense when taken into context. I kinda wish they had gone with the original title Tomorrow Never Lies. I just don't understand EON's obsession with the words "death", "kill", or "die". Teri Hatcher is dreadful but hot. Wai Ling made for a good Bond girl in the sense that she was just as strong and just as dangerous as Bond . She doesn't bend, break, or back down. Elliot Carver is a good villain in general and the plot isn't so unrealistic. However in the end its too campy, Pierce is just bad in this, and I just find it hard to enjoy it.

20.Octopussy-Great choice for a title EON. I mean really? I understand that its the title character of the movie but it just seems like you were getting desperate and figured if it sounded like a porno that it would be more successful. This is when Roger Moore should've left as he is very awful here. Octopussy, herself is a very weak Bond girl. Maud Adams is just wrong for the part. She was great(and beautiful) in The Man with the Golden Gun but she seems out of place here and I'd prefer not to have the visual of 55 year old Roger Moore having sex with a 37 year old Maud Adams. Kamal Khan is the main antagonist but I wasn't fond of him. I'm not too keen on the plotline either as its too much Indiana Jones and too little James Bond.

21.Moonraker-It kinda grew on me. I mean its still in the bottom 5 but isn't as bad as I remember it. Sure the plotline drags and theirs camp galore but I really don't mind this movie seeing it the 3rd time around. Still isn't Top 20 material though.

22.Never Say Never Again-This film really dropped. After re-evaluating the others and this I felt this film is vastly inferior by a large margin. Sure the pacing is better than Thunderball but it doesn't quite translate into a good Bond film. I wonder if its just that or lack of Bond atmosphere. There is an edited version out there called Never Say McClory Again with edited Bond motifs, music, and themes. I'll have to try and find it sometime.

23.A View to a Kill-This film had so much potential. The first 56 minutes are great but the rest sucks so bad that this film is bottom 5 material. I'm not sure what happened but right after the film leaves Europe it drops faster than Roger Moore's facelift. Roger wasn't a bad Bond but this film exposes him and his age. Tanya Roberts is dreadful as Stacy Sutton and the only saving grace(and its not Jones) was Walken and the chemistry between Moore and Patrick MacNee. Those two are like Holmes and Watson in this movie...ironic since they both played Holmes and Watson in Sherlock Holmes in New York.

24.Die Another Day-This film is the worst possible way to honor the 40th Anniversary of the series. Its so bad that it resulted in a reboot that should've happened 15 years earlier. They went back to the plot for Diamonds Are Forever and replaced Blofeld with Gustav Graves, Wint and Kidd with Zao, and changed Las Vegas to North Korea. They screw up from the get-go with the gunbarrell sequence. The first 40 or so minutes is actually great but once Bond heads to the Caribbean it goes straight to hell with the over-the-top plot and lame action sequences. Its one of those films where if it stayed simplistic and stuck with the "Who Betrayed Bond?" plot instead of adding Graves, Zao, Halle Berry, and Gustav's Wonderful Magnificent Technicolor Dream Coat then it would've been Top 10 material. But no EON blew it and it sent the series back to where it had been at the end of A View to a Kill. Somehow though the worst Bond film did NOT come from EON.

25.Casino Royale(1967)-First off its not meant to be taken seriously as its supposed to be a parody of the EON Bond series. My problem with it though is that its not even funny. I just can't laugh at this film. The whole film just doesn't make any sense to me. I do realize this is in the middle of the "absurdest" era in film and theatre but this just isn't that absurd nor is it funny. James Bond is played by David Niven here and he doesn't do a bad job but he's rather old and rather out of placed. It has a great cast, its astonishing to see this cast list that has Orson Welles, Woody Allen, and Peter Sellers but I just don't get it. Apparently the original idea was to make this a serious adaptation of the book. They even wanted to get Sean Connery to be in it. However they realized if they tried making their own Bond series they'd get killed so they just made a parody. Its tragic watching this because Orson Welles never recovered, Peter Sellers(who is fantastic as an actor and entertainer) never recovered, and Charles K. Feldman lost a lot of money because of this film running over budget and ended up dying a year later. Its ashame because from what I read Connery wanted to do this film but demanded 1 million dollars. Feldman thought that was too much and in the end of production is quoted in saying that if they had gone with the "serious" route and got Connery it would've been cheaper. Feldman is a great producer but this is just a mess. In my opinion even if they hadn't gotten Connery a serious Bond film with either Peter Sellers or David Niven as Bond would've been just as good. It still baffles me though that EON refused to buy the rights to this until 2004. The source is the very first Bond novel and it makes for a great movie. It wouldn't be until 2006 that a proper adaptation of Casino Royale was made. The entire film is on YouTube if you want to watch.

Actors(non EON included):
1.Sean Connery(1962-1967, 1971, 1983)-Connery in my view is the best because he epitomizes Bond. He is what Bond should be. His first five films are greatness. Diamonds Are Forever while he's nowhere near as good he's still better than anything else in the film and it still beats most of Moore's films. Never Say Never Again is not bad when you consider he's playing an aging Bond(unlike Moore who's trying to play a regular Bond). I actually would have liked to see him return to the series(either as Bond, M, or even a villain) but its unlikely now. Overall he IS James Bond.

2.Timothy Dalton(1987-1989)-I liked his grittier more intense Bond. It really fits the 1980's. He made two great films and he would've improved Goldeneye had he been in it. Its ashame though because most don't remember Dalton too well because of the lack of success of Licence to Kill. I think even Cubby Broccoli believes that Dalton is an ideal Bond when you consider he was approached for the role in 1968 for On Her Majesty's Secret Service(at the age of 21) and in 1979 for For Your Eyes Only. I do wish he had been involved in the series in the 90's rather than...

3.Pierce Brosnan(1995-2002)-While he is ranked 3rd I personally don't care too much for him. His performances in Goldeneye and The World is Not Enough are good but his performances in Tomorrow Never Dies and Die Another Day are dreadful. I do wonder however what The Living Daylights would have been like if NBC hadn't screwed Pierce over by renewing Remington Steele costing him the part of Bond.

4.Roger Moore(1973-1985)-I'll catch even more heat here. I just don't like Roger Moore's Bond. I can't blame Roger for wearing out his welcome(the money was just too good). He was good in his first three outings but his final four really hurts him for me. I do wish he'd been less campy and comedic and more like his Simon Templar character from The Saint.

5.Barry Nelson(1954)-While I do think that Bond should be British I also think that Barry made a good Bond. He wasn't British but he was charming, smart, witty, and kinda cool and those are key characteristics when it comes to playing James Bond. My issue though with his Bond is that his name is Jimmy Bond and that just seems off in my view.

6.Daniel Craig(2006-Present)-I just don't feel Bond with this guy at least not yet. He plays a good literature Bond but he has yet to capture the Bond we saw from Connery, Moore, Dalton, or Brosnan. I think though I'll have him higher by the time his films come to an end.

7.George Lazenby(1969)-He's not a very good actor and not suited for Bond. He tries to act like Connery too much at times and he just ends up looking foolish. I do think he could've improved if he had stayed on but his one outing was just bad and his attitude on the set made it worse. I will say ironically enough his final scene as Bond is the most touching of the series.

8.David Niven(1967)-I know he shouldn't count but he still made a bad Bond. However he could've been good in an EON film. We will never know that however.

Top 5 Best Villains:
1.Ernst Stavro Blofeld(You Only Live Twice, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, Diamonds are Forever)-Brilliant mastermind and a very dangerous man. He's at his best in the first two. His scheme is a little outlandish in DAF but he's still the one guy I think of when I hear "Bond villain". Its ashame that people associate his look with Dr. Evil.

2.Franz Sanchez(Licence to Kill)-Like Blofeld a brilliant mastermind and very dangerous. If you piss him off its not going to be pretty and he has all the money in the world to buy your friendship, your trust, and your life.

3.Scaramanga(The Man with the Golden Gun)-He's got a powerful weapon, he charges a million a shot. He's an assassin, second to none, he's the Man with the Golden Gun. Scaramanga is the perfect compliment to Bond. He'd be Number 1 if they had taken the character more serious.

4.Max Zorin(A View to a Kill)-He's basically an improved version of Goldfinger. While he may be a creepy albino looking evil german he's a tough and dangerous one. I was actually sadden by Zorin's death and wish he had killed Bond instead. He's the only good thing about that movie.

5.Alec Trevelyn(Goldeneye)-I liked that they went with the "Hans Gruber" model with him and I like even more that for once Bond's enemy is one of his own agents. The concept of 006 is fantastic and he makes for the perfect antagonist.

Top 5 Worst Villains:
1.Dr. Noah(1967's Casino Royale)-I really shouldn't count this film but since its ALL Bond related material I will. I like Woody Allen but a Bond villain basically being a Woody Allen character is just dumb. So if you really want the real worst Bond villain look no further than...

2.Dominic Greene(Quantum of Solace)-I understand that he is a dangerous man in the model of Blofeld but he's not intimidating and he is not even a cool villain ala Sanchez.

3.Kamal Khan(Octopussy)-He just annoys me by existing. The less said about Octopussy the better.

4.Mr. Big(Live and Let Die)-The novel version resembles Franz Sanchez heavily but the film version is just plain dumb. While he is dangerous and intimidating he's a complete idiot who could've killed Bond easily but chose to be extremely dumb and let him live too long.

5.Gustav Graves(Die Another Day)-Dull, un-intimidating, and just boring.

Top 5 Bond Theme Songs:
1.James Bond Main Theme(Dr. No) by John Barry-Its the fricken Bond theme so why the hell not?

2.You Know My Name(Casino Royale 2006) by Chris Cornell-It describes the newer Bond perfectly in the sense of him being inexperienced. You know his name but he's not the same Bond. Chris Cornell's voice also makes the song enjoyable.

3.Goldfinger Title Theme by Shirley Bassey-Its the standard for all the Bond theme songs. The sound is classic and Shirley Bassey has a beautiful voice.

4.Goldeneye by Tina Turner-U2 lyrics + The Edge on Guitar + Tina Turner's voice = WIN.

5.Licence to Kill by Gladys Knight-LTK has it all. Theirs a great plot, a great villain, a great performance by Timothy Dalton, and there's a title song that's one of the best. Gladys brings real emotion to this theme something that had been lacking in other Bond films. The vocals alone make this song.

Top 5 Bond Girls:
1.Honey Ryder(Dr. No)-The original and the standard that all Bond girls should follow.

2.Pam Bouvier(Licence to Kill)-She is a bit of a different Bond girl. She is tougher(maybe even more than Bond), dangerous, and she's very resourceful.

3.Anya Amasova(The Spy Who Loved Me)-Basically the female equivalent to Bond. She is dangerous, tough, and very sexy. I wish they had brought her back for later films.

4.Pussy Galore(Goldfinger)-I don't like the name but she's still a very well done character and is resourceful in helping Bond.

5.Kara Milovy(The Living Daylights)-While she is more of a "damsel in distress" type I tend to not like Bond films I find her to be in the Top 5 primarily because she's a very good character in the sense that she adds to the plot and isn't just some useless bimbo Bond finds. I felt sorry for her as her boyfriend is just a total tool. Beautiful, talented(musically), and enjoyable.

Top M's:
1.Bernard Lee(1962-1979)-The original and the best. Bernard Lee is the model for what M should be like.

2.Robert Brown(1983-1989)-Very good replacement. Some don't like his version of the character but I enjoyed it as he played the part properly and was strong in his stance.

3.Judi Dench(1995-Present)-She was good in the Brosnan films but I've grown tired of her all together. I wish she hadn't been brought back for the new series as she doesn't really fit anymore. I do wish they'd make "M" a male again as the gender angle annoyed me in the Brosnan series.

4.Edward Fox(1983's Never Say Never Again)-I wasn't fond of his performance. He brought no real personality to the character and M should never be younger than Bond no matter what circumstance.

5.John Huston(1967's Casino Royale)-Same reasoning why Dr. Noah is number 1.

Top Moneypenny's:
1.Lois Maxwell(1962-1985)-The original and the best. She's what the character should be modeled after. Its sad she never got her "bond girl" moment with James.

2.Caroline Bliss(1987-1989)-She's not a bad replacement and she did a good job trying to be like Maxwell's character. Its ashame she only got 2 films and had only 1 minute of screen time in LTK.

3.Samantha Bond(1995-2002)-Just inferior to the previous ones. She doesn't really become Moneypenny until Die Another Day and by then it was too late. She also isn't as resourceful as the others.

4.Pamela Salem(1983's Never Say Never Again)-She doesn't really do anything.

That concludes this edition. Feel free to go back to my earlier review for comparison sakes.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Movies I Like(and You Will Too):The Graduate



Hello and welcome to the first edition of Movies I Like(and You Will Too), a brand new section on this blog. In this one I talk about films I like and why I like them. The idea of this section is to recommend films that I like to you, my reader through various reasons as to why I like the films. Our first edition revolves around the 1967 classic The Graduate starring Dustin Hoffman and Anne Bancroft.

Background:
In 1963, Charles Webb wrote a novel entitled The Graduate. It told the story of Benjamin Braddock, a young man who had just finished graduating from college and his affair with Mrs. Robinson, an older woman who is the wife of Ben’s father’s business partner. In 1966 Embassy Pictures, an Independent company began production on the film. The part of Ben Braddock proved difficult to cast as originally it was set to be Warren Beatty, who was replaced by Robert Redford and then Charles Grodin before settling on a then-unknown Dustin Hoffman.

For the role of Mrs. Robinson Grayson Hall, Judy Garland, and Patricia Neal were considered before Anne Bancroft was selected. The film also featured Katherine Ross as Elaine Robinson, William Daniels as Mr. Braddock, Murray Hamilton as Mr. Robinson, and Elizabeth Wilson as Mrs. Braddock.

What’s To Like:
Dustin Hoffman as Ben Braddock-This was Hoffman’s very first role in a film after years of television and stage acting. Despite being a little too old for a college graduate (Hoffman was 30 while Braddock was supposed to be 22), he pulls the part of Ben Braddock off very well with undertones of a confused young man looking for something in the world and not being sure on what his future looks like. He also manages to pull off the “awkwardness” of Ben Braddock. Ben is not the typical type of college kid who goes to class, studies, and parties but more of someone who’s looking for something in his life. As the film shows Ben’s lack of sexual inexperience is showcased (which adds to the awkwardness of his character as scenes with him and Anne Bancroft show) and Hoffman plays the part of the reluctant, sexually inexperienced, shy college graduate very well.

Anne Bancroft as Mrs. Robinson
-The role of Mrs. Robinson was quite a different part for Anne Bancroft at this point of her career as she had previously played “lighter”, more “sympathetic” characters. In this film she plays a character that in a way is similar to Ben in a few aspects. We learn about Mrs. Robinson throughout her affair and when you listen to her story it makes her character compare with Ben in the aspect that he’s reluctant about his future while she has already had her life in place and in her mind “ruined” by obstacles thrown along her way. Anne plays the part of the sexually unfulfilled and miserable 40-something very well and is quite tempting to look at throughout the film.

Simon and Garfunkel
-This was the one of the first films to incorporate the use of popular music by real bands into a movie. It’s the use of the music that makes it work. The songs featured by Simon and Garfunkel include: The Sound of Silence, April Come She Will, Scarborough Fair/Canticle, and Mrs. Robinson. Each song fits its respective scenes well and contributes to one of the best music soundtracks in cinematic history.

The Things You May Not Have Noticed-The Graduate is one of those films that have things that tend to go by unnoticed if you don’t pay close attention or think about. One of the things that may go unnoticed is Norman Fell as Mr. McCleery, the landlord. This preceded Fell’s part as Mr. Roper in Three’s Company by a full 10 years. The Mr. McCleery character is very much the same as Mr. Roper 10 years later. Another thing from the apartment scene is a cameo appearance by a young Richard Dreyfuss playing the role of a tenant.

Fun Facts:
Adjust for inflation, The Graduate has made $680,292,600 and ranks Number 19 all-time in the highest grossing films in the U.S. and Canada.

The Graduate was filmed on a 3 million dollar budget and went on to gross 104 million in 1967.

The Graduate soundtrack rose to Number 1 in 1968 surpassing The Beatles’ The White Album.

The film was selected by the Library of Congress for preservation in 1996.

The American Film Institute named it the 17th best film of all-time in 2007.

Awards Won:
Academy Awards:
Best Director-Mike Nichols

BAFTA:

Best Direction-Mike Nichols
Best Film
Best Film Editing-Sam O’Steen
Best Screenplay-Calder Willingham and Buck Henry
Most Promising Newcomer in a Lead Role-Dustin Hoffman

Directors Guild of America:
Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Motion Pictures-Mike Nichols, Don Kranze, Lynn Guthrie

Golden Globes:
Best Motion Picture Comedy/Musical
Best Motion Picture Actress Comedy/Musical-Anne Bancroft
Best Motion Picture Director-Mike Nichols
Most Promising Newcomer Female-Katharine Ross
Most Promising Newcomer Male-Dustin Hoffman

Grammy Awards:

Best Original Score for a Motion Picture-Simon and Garfunkel

Laurel Awards:

Best Supporting Actress-Katharine Ross

New York Film Critics Circle:
Best Director-Mike Nichols

Writer’s Guild of America:

Best Written American Comedy-Calder Willingham and Buck Henry

Overall whether it’s my own opinion or the opinion of others, The Graduate remains as one of the greatest films as all-time after 43 years. It is one of my personal favorites. Give it a chance and it may become one of your personal favorites too.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

In Conclusion:The Dirty Harry Series



In 2008 I saw the film Dirty Harry for the first time ever. However I only saw it on the "edited for TV" form on the History Channel. Last month I started my series entitled "In Conclusion" based on various film series. For my third edition I decided to go back and watch all five Dirty Harry films for the first time ever. In this edition I will give a final perspective on the series and rank each film, each Clint Eastwood performance, each antagonist, each partner, and each character played by Albert Popwell(who was in the first four films of the series as a different character in each). Here are my rankings.

Films:
1.Dirty Harry-This was the beginning of the "tough cop" era of action films which would run from this point til about 1988 when Die Hard changed everything. Dirty Harry was the case of taking a classic detective versus killer story and giving it a modern twist using conflicts from that time period(such as criminal rights and the changing view on how policemen should conduct their work). What adds to this story is that it took place right around the same time the Zodiac Killer was running rampant through the Bay Area. The Zodiac, himself would be the inspiration for the main antagonist the Scorpio Killer as most of his actions reflected those of the Zodiac. Its a nonstop thriller that keeps you on the edge of your seat from start to finish and really makes you think.

2.Magnum Force-This was good. I will say though that Dirty Harry didn't need a sequel and should've been just one film. However Magnum Force nearly surpasses the original. Clint's performance in this film is very great and it has the best twist I've ever seen in an action movie. Like Dirty Harry it makes you think and it has some pretty wicked action sequences.

3.The Enforcer-The plotline is great. However it is very strangely formatted. The entire ending sequence felt like it was rushed. I'm also not really fond of the storyline with Harry's partner Kate. I do understand the time period and that the idea of the series is that Harry does things the old fashion way but I wish they had dedicated more time to the Strike Force than they did that. Like the previous two films their is a message in it but unlike the previous two there just isn't any good action sequences. It had potential but collapsed in the first 20 minutes. The lack of mystery also hurt it in my mind as the antagonist is established in the first 2 minutes.

4.Sudden Impact-This is a fine example of how early to mid-80's style of film making can to be totally cheesy. I felt the series was just fine at three films due to the third one indicating that Harry may leave the force. However Dirty Harry returned by popular demand. Sudden Impact starts out great but the minute I see Sondra Locke I start cringing. This is an example of why no one should have too much power, Clint was granted both directing, producing and casting rights for this film. Don't get me wrong Clint is a great director and an ok producer but the fact you allowed him to cast his girlfriend in the lead female role just sickens me. Too much focus on her. This doesn't even feel like a Dirty Harry film nor should it even exist. The only redeeming qualities to this film is the action in it and a great antagonist in Mick the Rapist. It had potential but they really should've done a straight Dirty Harry film and not a Hitchcockian piece.

5.The Dead Pool-They went back to San Francisco for this film(which made me happy). I consider this film to be the end of "tough, hard nosed cop dealing with thugs" era in action films. This film is why I would love to see one final Dirty Harry film. To this day I'm not even sure why they made it. Clint doesn't look interested and the whole film just wreaks of the same cheese that annoyed me in Sudden Impact. I felt they just rushed this film and could've done better if there was any actual message to it. There are some redeeming qualities to it such as Jim Carrey playing rocker Johnny Squares and lip synching Welcome to the Jungle. You also have Liam Neeson as the film director Peter Swan and a cameo appearance by Guns N' Roses. Despite all this the film falls flat and I feel its a rather poor way of ending the series.

Clint Eastwood Performances:
1.Dirty Harry-I don't care how good Gene Hackman did in The French Connection, Clint's performance here blew him away. Its an even bigger crime that he wasn't nominated for Best Actor.

2.The Enforcer-Clint reverted back to his older form in the original film. There were times in Magnum Force that felt like he wasn't playing Harry. Here he returns to form and I think the final scene gives this film a boost over Magnum Force.

3.Magnum Force-Despite being a great film, I felt Clint's performance suffered. I'm not sure whether to blame it on the writers of the film or Clint himself but there were times where it just didn't seem like he was playing 'Dirty' Harry Callahan. The lack of an iconic scene the ending of the first hurts it too.

4.The Dead Pool-He actually seems interested here. His performance is maybe 10 feet away from reaching the level of his Magnum Force performance but there are times where it seems to lack(likely due to the writing of the script). I got a similar vibe to the original but it falls short.

5.Sudden Impact-Like I mentioned, it didn't feel like a Dirty Harry film. In fact I can make a case that he only plays Harry twice during the film. The first time when he's in San Francisco and in the final scene. Otherwise it felt like a typical 80's neo noir melodrama. I know Clint loves the series but he just didn't look interested here.

Antagonists:
1.The Scorpio Killer(Dirty Harry)-Sick, sadistic, creepy, disturbing all is linked toward this character. I think him being based on the real-life Zodiac Killer helps this character. Truth be told, its probably the closest depiction of the Zodiac in cinema. Andy Robinson like Clint, should've been nominated for an Oscar.

2.The Magnum Force(Magnum Force)-I won't go into details because I'd rather not spoil Magnum Force.

3.Mick the Rapist(Sudden Impact)-He doesn't have much screen time but in the time he is on screen you get a similar vibe that the Scorpio Killer gave off. I believe what hurts him is the lack of screen time. But overall just like the Scorpio Killer he's creepy, sick, sadistic, and disturbing.

4.The People's Revolutionary Strike Force(The Enforcer)-This group has a lot of potential but its not really developed like Scorpio nor is it mysterious like the Magnum Force. They do give the leader Bobby Maxwell a backstory but otherwise they're not as interesting as the Magnum Force nor is Maxwell as sadistic as Scorpio.

5.The Psychotic Dude(The Dead Pool)-I know his name but I won't disclose any details because I don't like spoiling movies in my review(particularly serious ones that a casual viewer may have interest in seeing). I just think this character was heavily rushed and would've been served better if they had done more with him.

Best Partners:
1.Chico Gonzalez(Dirty Harry)-He doesn't get in the way and he is very helpful towards saving Harry's life. Harry probably wishes he still had him for later films.

2.Kate Moore(The Enforcer)-I know I mentioned that I disliked the subplot with her but I enjoyed her character for the most part because she's actually semi-useful toward Harry particularly in the final scenes.

3.Early Smith(Magnum Force)-I really can't say too many things positive except that he was at least semi-helpful to Harry. However he's a total complete idiot.

4.Al Quan(The Dead Pool)-The karate severely annoyed me since it seems like every Asian in film between 1970 and 1998 know karate. He actually helps out with Harry and fights back against the people targeting him.

5.Horace King(Sudden Impact)-I sincerely don't remember him doing anything except dying. I often question his purpose in this film.

Characters Played by Albert Popwell:
1.Bank Robber(Dirty Harry)-Only because of this scene


2.Mustapha(The Enforcer)-Very resourceful to helping Harry against the Strike Force. I wish they had brought him back as an antagonist later in the series.

3.The Pimp(Magnum Force)-Well he drove a nice car. The character is pretty sadistic too bad he gets wasted later.

4.Horace King(Sudden Impact)-I seriously think you could erase him from this movie and no one would notice.

Overall:The "Dirty Harry" series would probably be ranked as one of, if not the greatest trilogy of all-time had they just stopped after The Enforcer. However the next two films just drug the series down. I personally think that Dirty Harry is great as a stand-alone film and that the sequels were completely pointless. However I still like Magnum Force and to some extent I like The Enforcer. Sudden Impact and The Dead Pool, however I can live without. I hope they do make a final film but with Clint pushing 80 that just isn't going to happen. Its ashame because Harry walking off with the reporter in The Dead Pool has no real meaning and is a poor way of ending the series. This is the end of "In Conclusion:Dirty Harry" stay tuned for next edition of "In Conclusion" at some point in the future.

Friday, March 12, 2010

In Conclusion:The Die Hard Series



In 2008 I saw Die Hard for the first time. Afterwards I sat and watched Live Free or Die Hard. In the time since I've seen Die Hard with a Vengeance edited for TV and Die Hard 2. The last two days I went back over the series uncut and commercial free. So here are my rankings:

Films:
1.Die Hard-the original that serves as the format for the modern action film. While it maintains a serious tone there is some good humor along with a fantastic story and the coolest villains you'll ever see on screen. Greatest movie of the 80's? Yes, Greatest action movie of all-time? Yes, Greatest movie of all-time? Maybe. Bruce Willis is at his best here and Alan Rickman should've been nominated for an oscar.

2.Die Hard with a Vengeance-Samuel L. Jackson + Bruce Willis=Greatness. The plotline itself is very interesting as it perfectly relates to the original. Jeremy Irons as Simon Gruber is brilliant and it has some fun scenes.

3.Die Hard 2-This film while it serves a purpose just doesn't make sense in context. Die Hard was very successful because it had great characters, a great plot, and a great villain. They tried the same thing here replacing the Terrorists with Mercenaries, the Plaza with Dulles, L.A. with D.C., and added a very good twist. My issue though is that McClane is just too invincible for my liking and Renny Harlin just went too overboard with the graphic depths in this film(mainly the icicle to the eye and throat slitting sequence).

4.Live Free or Die Hard-Its nice to see John McClane back but I feel everything in this movie is vastly inferior to the previous films in every way. I think my issue with modern stories makes it hard for me to enjoy the story here. I'd rather see John McClane fighting dangerous terrorists who use guns not computers. I understand that the idea of a "Hans Gruber" villain is unrealistic in the modern world even for films, but it'd be nice to see McClane fighting someone who looks like a threat not some disgruntled techie.

Bruce Willis Performances:
1.Die Hard-Simply brilliant and one of the few times I've enjoyed Bruce's acting.

2.Die Hard with a Vengeance-I think the return of John McTiernan helped with Bruce getting back to original form but he's still inferior to his performance in his original.

3.Die Hard 2-Like I mentioned it was as if they tried to mimmick the first one and again they just didn't do a good job with that.

4.Live Free or Die Hard-As badass as he was, it just doesn't feel like he's playing John McClane, it feels like he's playing a parody of the character.

Villains:
1.Hans Gruber-the original and the best. He is brilliant mastermind and was a very capable threat to McClane.

2.Simon Gruber-just like his older brother a mastermind who was perfect in his mind games against McClane. Not as cool as his brother, however.

3.Colonel Stewart-They tried to mimmick the brilliance of Hans Gruber with a twist of being a fighter but they just fall short here. He's not a strong antagonist nor is he a smart one.

4.Thomas Gabriel-A complete total pussy. Nuff Said.

Sidekicks:
1.Zeus Carver-Total badass and the perfect compliment to McClane.

2.Al Powell-Nothing better for a Christmas movie than the jolly fatman himself albeit the most badass fat man in the history of film.

3.Matthew Farrell-Just because he's Number 3 does not mean he's superior to anyone. It means that theres no 4. I just didn't get into this character like Al and Zeus. He just doesn't hold up anyone near as good as either. The main reason he's 3 is because theres no clear cut sidekick in Die Hard 2.

Overall:The Die Hard series is possibly the best action series in film not called James Bond. I do hear that Die Hard 5 is likely. I hope its more like 1 and 3 and less like 4. When that comes out I will repost this. Stay tuned for the Dirty Harry series next.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

In Conclusion:The James Bond Series



In 2008 I saw the recent version of Casino Royale for the first time. The result was an interest in the James Bond series for me.In April 2009 I began going over the James Bond series. I began with Dr. No and concluded with A View to a Kill. Included in this was the non-Eon production Never Say Never Again.

I wrapped the series up the same month with the option of watching the rest later. Over the next few months I went over the next four films in the series The Living Daylights, Licence to Kill, Goldeneye, and Tomorrow Never Dies. The previous 2 weeks I have decided to finish the series by watching the uncut versions of the previously mentioned films while going back over On Her Majesty's Secret Service, The Spy Who Loved Me, and A View to a Kill and seeing The World is Not Enough, Die Another Day, Quantum of Solace, the 1954 made for tv film Casino Royale, and the 1967 parody of the priorly mentioned film. The result is my listing of Top Films, Theme Songs, Bond Girls, Bonds, M's, and Moneypenny's.

Films(non EON included):
1.Licence to Kill-This is what Ian Fleming had in mind when it came to James Bond. I know fans of the series typically dislike it but Bond here is at its toughest. I'm happy to see a vengeance plot for a Bond film because it was overdue by then. Robert Davi as Franz Sanchez makes for a BAMF villain.

2.You Only Live Twice-Some criticize this as the downhill slope of the Bond series. In my view I consider this to be the pinnacle of the Connery/Lazenby/Moore era. Sean Connery does a fantastic job and the payoff is reveal of Blofeld. 1960's Japan makes it even more fun.

3.The Living Daylights-This was a turn in the right direction for the series. A View to a Kill was the pit of the series and this film brought it back from the grave it was about to hit. The plotline makes this film. What hurt is though is the lack of a strong central villain. We're presented with 3 antagonists:Brad Whitaker, Necros, and Koskov. Koskov is a pretty fun guy and a typical asshole but doesn't make for the strong antagonist. Necros is a good henchman but doesn't really do much. What throws me off is that Whitaker is supposed to be the main antagonist. Joe Don Baker for once does a great job in a film mainly because he's not playing a fat slob named Mitchell or a fatter slob named Thomas Jefferson Geronimo III. In my opinion they should've done more with Whitaker; but the plotline, Timothy Dalton, and the very beautiful Kara Milovy safe it.

4.Goldeneye-For the first time since the Connery days they actually made 3 straight good Bond films. Goldeneye is a classic no matter what anyone says. Pierce Brosnan's Bond isn't as good as Timothy Dalton's but he still does a good job in this film. Sean Bean as 006 is a fantastic antagonist and the Bond humor is very well done here.

5.Goldfinger-It was nice to see Bond come to America, I wish he'd done more there in the 60's. What makes this a good Bond film is that you have a good plotline, a great villain and the film wastes no time getting to the action. My issue is they throw it at an odd spot. In the first two films they were building up SPECTRE but they seem to drop it here. Another factor that hurts it is that Bond is held captive for most of the film. Shirley Bassey's opening song also adds to its greatness.

6.From Russia with Love-I didn't like it the first time around. However upon second viewing I consider it to be a great edition in the series. It was a vast improvement over Dr. No. Tatiana Romanova is the best Bond girl of the Connery films hands down. Red Grant makes for a very perfect and capable antagonist to Bond and Rosa Klebb is what every Bond female villain should be modeled after.

7.Casino Royale(2006)-As much as I wish it had been done in the 60's, this film was worth the wait. As much as I don't like the new grittier Bond, I feel this is still a good movie. Daniel Craig plays a very good Bond here(the same can't be said for Quantum) and I feel the performances by each of the actors were very well done. Nice to see a faithful Fleming adaptation for a change. Its a very good start to the new series even if I don't like the direction of it.

8.The World is Not Enough-I'll get some heat for this but I really liked this film. I consider it to be the bizzaro version of On Her Majesty's Secret Service in the sense that Elektra appears to be Tracy, a scared girl who is sad and needs Bond. The twist in the middle makes it more enjoyable. My only issues with this film is that I dislike Renard and that Denise Richards sucks at acting. Otherwise I like the plot, I like Pierce's performance, I like Elektra, and Judi Dench is at her best here.

9.The Man with the Golden Gun-The idea of assassin vs assassin makes this film fun. Scaramanga is a great villain and the perfect rival for Bond. China made for a good setting in this film but its not as fun as a setting as Japan was. My problem with this film is that they don't take it serious. I have problem with Scaramanga having a sidekick but Nick Nack was just not a proper choice. I also feel that J.W. Pepper was completely unnecessary. Christopher Lee has one of his best performances here and for once I enjoyed Roger Moore's Bond. I do think if this was a Connery or Dalton film it would've been better.

10.Diamonds Are Forever-Connery's final outing(well at least to the people at EON). What I liked about this film was the plotline for starters particularly the swerve in the middle. Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd make very good henchmen and I feel they should've been used more in this film. Charles Gray's Blofeld was really odd but I didn't mind it too much. However I take issue with the "Blofeld in drag" scene. They somehow took a threatening and dangerous villain and made him a comedic villain. This film is where we start seeing the campy Bond that plauged cinemas til A View to a Kill. I felt if they took this more serious it would've been in my Top 5. However I will say I liked the humor. Something I can't say about any of the Moore entries.

11.On Her Majesty's Secret Service-This is another film I didn't like the first time around. However after viewing it again I've come to love it. While I dislike Blofeld's scheme I do like the story with Bond and Tracy. What hurts this film though is that the lighting is extremely poor at times and George Lazenby aside from one scene is just bad. Otherwise I enjoy the music, I enjoy the acting(not Lazneby's however), I enjoy the plotline(the Bond/Tracy one not Blofeld's scheme), and I enjoy this film. I just wish someone else was Bond.

12.The Spy Who Loved Me-I don't like saying it but...I enjoyed Roger Moore in this film. Typically I dislike the Moore films but in this case I liked it. Stromberg isn't a bad villain but I particularly don't care for him. Its nice seeing Bond actually working with the Navy for once and XXX is simply beautiful. Jaws is a great henchmen but its absurd that he survives ANYTHING. The action sequences are fun and I wish that they reverted back to being serious after this. Sadly it just got more silly. I do wonder though how different it would've been if they had gone with Blofeld as the villain once more.

13.Never Say Never Again-Yes I mentioned this before I mentioned Thunderball. My reasoning for liking this more than Thunderball is that its more fast paced and more faithful to the novel. Sean Connery doesn't do as good as an acting job he did in Thunderball but he's still enjoyable. My problems however is that Blofeld really serves no purpose here as he never meets Bond. I also didn't care for Largo in this film nor for Domino. This film does however serve for a purpose as several elements(a dangerous female villain in Fatima Blush, Felix Leiter as an african-american, and M's lack of interest in the 00 division) ends up appearing in the EON series later on. I'd like to see an edited version of this complete with the regular Bond music and gunbarrel.

14.Thunderball-Some consider this to be Connery's best Bond, I disagree. I somewhat enjoyed this film but there were just times where it dragged. Its not a bad Bond film but at the same time I don't consider it to be too good either. For more info see my "Film Feuds" article below between Thunderball and Never Say Never Again. I do enjoy the title song though.

15.Dr. No-Its a start lets put it that way. To this day I'm not sure why they chose Dr. No to start the series. Its not a bad choice and it does establish the standard of Bond films. I didn't like this the 2nd time though as much as I did the first. Dr. No is not a bad villain but he's not as good as the ones who came after. I consider this the equivalent to a TV pilot.

16.Casino Royale(1954)-Yes the only James Bond film in the 50's. Its rather odd looking back as it doesn't resemble the EON series at all. There are times I get the Bond feel to it but I don't like some of the ideas they had. Bond should be British no matter what anyone says. I liked Barry Nelson's performance but I can't ever imagine him playing Bond in the EON series. He tried that's all I can say. Peter Lorre made for a great villain. I liked him as Le Chiffre and while he doesn't fit the mold of an EON Bond villain he still makes for a very capable and strong antagonist. I wonder what a 1950's Bond series would be like.

17.Tomorrow Never Dies-The title makes no sense when taken into context. I kinda wish they had gone with the original title Tomorrow Never Lies. I just don't understand EON's obsession with the words "death", "kill", or "die". Teri Hatcher is dreadful but hot. Wai Ling made for a good Bond girl in the sense that she was just as strong and just as dangerous as Bond . She doesn't bend, break, or back down. Elliot Carver is a good villain in general and the plot isn't so unrealistic. However in the end its too campy, Pierce is just bad in this, and I just find it hard to enjoy it.

18.Quantum of Solace-I liked that it wrapped up the story to Casino Royale but I feel that its too short, too dull, and weak in comparison. Dominic Greene is not a threatening villain nor is he a smart villain. My issue with modern antagonists is that they're too weak and too much of a coward. I'm interested in the Quantum storyline but if I see anymore like this, I will cringe. Its just a very bad movie, the title song isn't good, the plotline is okish, and Dominic Greene sucks.

19.Die Another Day-This film is the worst possible way to honor the 40th Anniversary of the series. Its so bad that it resulted in a reboot that should've happened 15 years earlier. They went back to the plot for Diamonds Are Forever and replaced Blofeld with Gustav Graves, Wint and Kidd with Zao, and changed Las Vegas to North Korea. They screw up from the get-go with the gunbarrell sequence. The first 40 or so minutes is actually great but once Bond heads to the Caribbean it goes straight to hell with the over-the-top plot and lame action sequences.

20.Live and Let Die-The opening sequence is rather odd with African-Americans killing random white guy. The title song is good(it is all Paul McCartney so naturally its great by default). But the film suffers for the fact that it just drags at times and Mr. Big makes for a bad Bond villain simply because its obvious who he is. From a 1970's perspective it seems good but in the year 2010 I find it dreadful.

21.For Your Eyes Only-I'll get heat for this one, but I just don't enjoy it at all. It feels more like a Soap Opera episode than it does a Bond film. Aristotle Kristatos is a rather boring villain and I didn't like the nymphet angle with Bibi either. The title song is nice(Sheena Easton has a beautiful voice) but the title sequence just blows.

22.Octopussy-Great choice for a title EON. I mean really? I understand that its the title character of the movie but it just seems like you were getting desperate and figured if it sounded like a porno that it would be more successful. This is when Roger Moore should've left as he is very awful here. Octopussy, herself is a very weak Bond girl. Maud Adams is just wrong for the part. She was great(and beautiful) in The Man with the Golden Gun but she seems out of place here and I'd prefer not to have the visual of 55 year old Roger Moore having sex with a 37 year old Maud Adams. Kamal Khan is the main antagonist but just like Kristatos he is weak and his presence annoys me. I'm not too keen on the plotline either.

23.Moonraker-I sincerely thought I would enjoy this but after seeing it I can't bring myself to liking it. Its just too absurd. They made two straight good Bond films with The Man with the Golden Gun and The Spy Who Loved Me then did this and its leads to the decline of the Moore series that reaches rock bottom...

24.A View to a Kill-Here. This film on paper looks good but it just was bad. Roger Moore should've never returned after For Your Eyes Only. He was 53 when he did that and was 57 here. I know Bond is supposed to be a seasoned veteran but its just not realistic for a man Roger's age to be doing the things Bond does. There's two good things about this film. One is the character Max Zorin. Christopher Walken is just brilliant and plays one of the best Bond villains of all-time. If this movie wasn't so bad he would've been nominated for an Oscar in my mind. The title song by Duran Duran is so great that I used it for Robot Fury. I think if you just replace Moore with Connery(a younger one obviously) or Dalton and just erase Tanya Roberts from this film then you would have a pretty good movie. However in the end it was just dreadful and its the worst of the EON Bond films. The good news for it is its not the worse film about James Bond. I think the next one takes the cake.

25.Casino Royale(1967)-First off its not meant to be taken seriously as its supposed to be a parody of the EON Bond series. My problem with it though is that its not even funny. I just can't laugh at this film. The whole film just doesn't make any sense to me. I do realize this is in the middle of the "absurdest" era in film and theatre but this just isn't that absurd nor is it funny. James Bond is played by David Niven here and he doesn't do a bad job but he's rather old and rather out of placed. It has a great cast, its astonishing to see this cast list that has Orson Welles, Woody Allen, and Peter Sellers but I just don't get it. Apparently the original idea was to make this a serious adaptation of the book. They even wanted to get Sean Connery to be in it. However they realized if they tried making their own Bond series they'd get killed so they just made a parody. Its tragic watching this because Orson Welles never recovered, Peter Sellers(who is fantastic as an actor and entertainer) never recovered, and Charles K. Feldman lost a lot of money because of this film running over budget and ended up dying a year later. Its ashame because from what I read Connery wanted to do this film but demanded 1 million dollars. Feldman thought that was too much and in the end of production is quoted in saying that if they had gone with the "serious" route and got Connery it would've been cheaper. Feldman is a great producer but this is just a mess. In my opinion even if they hadn't gotten Connery a serious Bond film with either Peter Sellers or David Niven as Bond would've been just as good. It still baffles me though that EON refused to buy the rights to this until 2004. The source is the very first Bond novel and it makes for a great movie. It wouldn't be until 2006 that a proper adaptation of Casino Royale was made. The entire film is on YouTube if you want to watch.

Actors(non EON included):
1.Sean Connery(1962-1967, 1971, 1983)-Connery in my view is the best because he epitomizes Bond. He is what Bond should be. His first five films are greatness. Diamonds Are Forever while he's nowhere near as good he's still better than anything else in the film and it still beats most of Moore's films. Never Say Never Again is not bad when you consider he's playing an aging Bond(unlike Moore who's trying to play a regular Bond). I actually would have liked to see him return to the series(either as Bond, M, or even a villain) but its unlikely now. Overall he IS James Bond.

2.Timothy Dalton(1987-1989)-I liked his more grittier more intense Bond. It really fits the 1980's. He made two great films and he would've improved Goldeneye had he been in it. Its ashame though because most don't remember Dalton too well because of the lack of success of Licence to Kill. I think even Cubby Broccoli believes that Dalton is an ideal Bond when you consider he was approached for the role in 1968 for On Her Majesty's Secret Service(at the age of 21) and in 1979 for For Your Eyes Only. I do wish he had been involved in the series in the 90's rather than...

3.Pierce Brosnan(1995-2002)-While he is ranked 3rd I personally don't care too much for him. His performances in Goldeneye and The World is Not Enough are good but his performances in Tomorrow Never Dies and Die Another Day are dreadful. I do wonder however what The Living Daylights would have been like if NBC hadn't screwed Pierce over by renewing Remington Steele costing him the part of Bond.

4.Roger Moore(1973-1985)-I'll catch even more heat here. I just don't like Roger Moore's Bond. I can't blame Roger for wearing out his welcome(the money was just too good). He was good in his first three outings but his final four really hurts him for me. I do wish he'd been less campy and comedic and more like his Simon Templar character from The Saint.

5.Barry Nelson(1954)-While I do think that Bond should be British I also think that Barry made a good Bond. He wasn't British but he was charming, smart, witty, and kinda cool and those are key characteristics when it comes to playing James Bond. My issue though with his Bond is that his name is Jimmy Bond and that just seems off in my view.

6.Daniel Craig(2006-Present)-I just don't feel Bond with this guy at least not yet. He plays a good literature Bond but he has yet to capture the Bond we saw from Connery, Moore, Dalton, or Brosnan. I think though I'll have him higher by the time his films come to an end.

7.George Lazenby(1969)-He's not a very good actor and not suited for Bond. He tries to act like Connery too much at times and he just ends up looking foolish. I do think he could've improved if he had stayed on but his one outing was just bad and his attitude on the set made it worse. I will say ironically enough his final scene as Bond is the most touching of the series.

8.David Niven(1967)-I know he shouldn't count but he still made a bad Bond. However he could've been good in an EON film. We will never know that however.

Top 5 Best Villains:
1.Ernst Stavro Blofeld(You Only Live Twice, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, Diamonds are Forever)-Brilliant mastermind and a very dangerous man. He's at his best in the first two. His scheme is a little outlandish in DAF but he's still the one guy I think of when I hear "Bond villain". Its ashame that people associate his look with Dr. Evil.

2.Franz Sanchez(Licence to Kill)-Like Blofeld a brilliant mastermind and very dangerous. If you piss him off its not going to be pretty and he has all the money in the world to buy your friendship, your trust, and your life.

3.Scaramanga(The Man with the Golden Gun)-He's got a powerful weapon, he charges a million a shot. He's an assassin, second to none, he's the Man with the Golden Gun. Scaramanga is the perfect compliment to Bond. He'd be Number 1 if they had taken the character more serious.

4.Max Zorin(A View to a Kill)-He's basically an improved version of Goldfinger. While he may be a creepy albino looking evil german he's a tough and dangerous one. I was actually sadden by Zorin's death and wish he had killed Bond instead. He's the only good thing about that movie.

5.Alec Trevelyn(Goldeneye)-I liked that they went with the "Hans Gruber" model with him and I like even more that for once Bond's enemy is one of his own agents. The concept of 006 is fantastic and he makes for the perfect antagonist.

Top 5 Worst Villains:
1.Dr. Noah(1967's Casino Royale)-I really shouldn't count this film but since its ALL Bond related material I will. I like Woody Allen but a Bond villain basically being a Woody Allen character is just dumb. So if you really want the real worst Bond villain look no further than...

2.Dominic Greene(Quantum of Solace)-I understand that he is a dangerous man in the model of Blofeld but he's not intimidating and he is not even a cool villain ala Sanchez.

3.Kamal Khan(Octopussy)-He just annoys me by existing. The less said about Octopussy the better.

4.Mr. Big(Live and Let Die)-The novel version resembles Franz Sanchez heavily but the film version is just plain dumb. While he is dangerous and intimidating he's a complete idiot who could've killed Bond easily but chose to be extremely dumb and let him live too long.

5.Gustav Graves(Die Another Day)-Dull, un-intimidating, and just boring.

Top 5 Bond Theme Songs:
1.James Bond Main Theme(Dr. No) by John Barry-Its the fricken Bond theme so why the hell not?

2.You Know My Name(Casino Royale 2006) by Chris Cornell-It describes the newer Bond perfectly in the sense of him being inexperienced. You know his name but he's not the same Bond. Chris Cornell's voice also makes the song enjoyable.

3.Goldfinger Title Theme by Shirley Bassey-Its the standard for all the Bond theme songs. The sound is classic and Shirley Bassey has a beautiful voice.

4.Goldeneye by Tina Turner-U2 lyrics + The Edge on Guitar + Tina Turner's voice = WIN.

5.Licence to Kill by Gladys Knight-LTK has it all. Theirs a great plot, a great villain, a great performance by Timothy Dalton, and there's a title song that's one of the best. Gladys brings real emotion to this theme something that had been lacking in other Bond films. The vocals alone make this song.

Top 5 Bond Girls:
1.Honey Ryder(Dr. No)-The original and the standard that all Bond girls should follow.

2.Pam Bouvier(Licence to Kill)-She is a bit of a different Bond girl. She is tougher(maybe even more than Bond), dangerous, and she's very resourceful.

3.Anya Amasova(The Spy Who Loved Me)-Basically the female equivalent to Bond. She is dangerous, tough, and very sexy. I wish they had brought her back for later films.

4.Pussy Galore(Goldfinger)-I don't like the name but she's still a very well done character and is resourceful in helping Bond.

5.Kara Milovy(The Living Daylights)-While she is more of a "damsel in distress" type I tend to not like Bond films I find her to be in the Top 5 primarily because she's a very good character in the sense that she adds to the plot and isn't just some useless bimbo Bond finds. I felt sorry for her as her boyfriend is just a total tool. Beautiful, talented(musically), and enjoyable.

Top M's:
1.Bernard Lee(1962-1979)-The original and the best. Bernard Lee is the model for what M should be like.

2.Robert Brown(1983-1989)-Very good replacement. Some don't like his version of the character but I enjoyed it as he played the part properly and was strong in his stance.

3.Judi Dench(1995-Present)-She was good in the Brosnan films but I've grown tired of her all together. I wish she hadn't been brought back for the new series as she doesn't really fit anymore. I do wish they'd make "M" a male again as the gender angle annoyed me in the Brosnan series.

4.Edward Fox(1983's Never Say Never Again)-I wasn't fond of his performance. He brought no real personality to the character and M should never be younger than Bond no matter what circumstance.

5.John Huston(1967's Casino Royale)-Same reasoning why Dr. Noah is number 1.

Top Moneypenny's:
1.Lois Maxwell(1962-1985)-The original and the best. She's what the character should be modeled after. Its sad she never got her "bond girl" moment with James.

2.Caroline Bliss(1987-1989)-She's not a bad replacement and she did a good job trying to be like Maxwell's character. Its ashame she only got 2 films and had only 1 minute of screen time in LTK.

3.Samantha Bond(1995-2002)-Just inferior to the previous ones. She doesn't really become Moneypenny until Die Another Day and by then it was too late. She also isn't as resourceful as the others.

4.Pamela Salem(1983's Never Say Never Again)-She doesn't really do anything.

This is the end of "In Conclusion" but it will return soon with the Die Hard series.